|
|
Most psychological models define resilience as the ability of a single person to "bounce back" from adversity. Fejerman argued that this was a Western, capitalist distortion. Through extensive fieldwork in the slums of Buenos Aires (villas miseria), the rural villages of Northern Argentina, and later in conflict zones in Central Africa, she observed that resilient individuals were always embedded in resilient networks. "There is no such thing as a self-made resilient person," Fejerman wrote. "Resilience is a verb, not a noun. It is something communities do, not something individuals have." Her research demonstrated that communities thrive not when they produce lone heroes, but when they cultivate dense, overlapping systems of mutual aid. For Fejerman, a mother surviving poverty was not resilient because of her "grit," but because of the three neighbors who watched her children, the local grocer who extended credit, and the church group that provided emotional solidarity.
For those seeking to understand the future of community, social health, and human dignity, the study of is not optional. It is essential. Are you inspired by the work of Ada Marta Fejerman? To learn more about the Fundación Puentes or to access her free "Relational Resilience Toolkit," visit your local academic library or follow her official social media channels for weekly Cafecito con Ada sessions. Ada Marta Fejerman
Once the map is complete, the foundation identifies "relational ruptures" (e.g., the old folks’ home that never talks to the elementary school) and facilitates "bridge events." These events are not charity drives; they are structured dialogues. Most psychological models define resilience as the ability
In an era defined by polarization, social media silos, and a crisis of loneliness, Fejerman’s work offers a path forward. She reminds us that the opposite of poverty is not wealth; the opposite of poverty is enough. And "enough" is not a bank balance—it is a network. "There is no such thing as a self-made
| Â |