Review your logs for . If you see outbound connections to non-standard ports (4443, 8088) or anomalous clfs.sys calls, you may have been on the hitlist yourself. The 0days are patched. The question is: did your work catch them in time? Keywords used: 0day, hitlist, week 01102024, work, CLFS driver, Chromium v8, Ivanti, threat intelligence, penetration testing, security operations.
Due to the complexity of crafting a reliable trigger, only APT groups (specifically TA544 and DarkHotel) were seen using this in high-value spear-phishing campaigns. 1.3 Ivanti Connect Secure Pre-Auth Command Injection Perhaps the loudest event of week 01102024 was the public disclosure (and immediate exploitation) of a pre-authentication command injection in Ivanti ICS appliances. This 0day allowed unauthenticated attackers to run curl commands to fetch second-stage implants. 0day and hitlist week 01102024 work
For red teams, the "work" is never done. The exploits used during that week are now likely burned (detected by antivirus), but the methodology —targeting CLFS, V8, and VPN appliances—remains evergreen. Review your logs for
Date: January 10, 2024 (Week 01102024) Author: Threat Intelligence Desk Classification: TLP:CLEAR Introduction In the relentless cat-and-mouse game of cybersecurity, the week of January 10, 2024 (encoded in the industry shorthand as 01102024 ) proved to be a watershed moment for vulnerability researchers, red teamers, and national security agencies. The keyword phrase circulating internal IRC channels, Slack workspaces, and dark web forums— "0day and hitlist week 01102024 work" —has become a loaded artifact. It refers to a specific confluence of unpatched zero-day exploits and a targeted "hitlist" of high-value assets that defined the threat landscape during that seven-day period. The question is: did your work catch them in time
For blue teams, the takeaway is clear: Patch management is dead as a primary defense. You must assume that a 0day exists on your perimeter right now. The "hitlist" is likely your own asset inventory, but sorted by an attacker’s priority, not yours.
This 0day was being sold as a "universal EoP" for $250,000 on an underground forum. By 01102024 , proof-of-concept (PoC) code had leaked to GitHub, forcing defenders to hunt for ntstatus: c000050c errors in their event logs. 1.2 Chromium v8 Type Confusion (Remote Code Execution) At the start of the week, a Type Confusion in the Turbofan JIT compiler (Issue 41497621) was being actively exploited in the wild. The hitlist for this 0day specifically included financial auditors and crypto wallet users. The exploit bypassed the V8 sandbox by confusing the compiler about a JSTypedArray object’s length. A simple Array.prototype.map call on a malicious website was enough to execute shellcode.
For security operations centers (SOCs) and penetration testers, this week represented a frantic scramble. For attackers, it was a window of opportunity. This article dissects the technical nuances of the 0days that dropped, the logic behind the "Hitlist," and how defenders adapted their triage workflows to survive the storm. A zero-day vulnerability is a software flaw unknown to the vendor. When a working exploit is combined with a zero-day, it becomes the ultimate asymmetric weapon. During the week of 01102024 , three major 0day clusters dominated the discourse. 1.1 The Windows Common Log File System (CLFS) Driver Elevation of Privilege Tracked under a temporary identifier (awaiting CVE assignment), this 0day targeted the clfs.sys driver. Researchers noticed that the exploit leveraged a race condition in the log file’s base record validation. The work required to weaponize this was significant: attackers needed to trigger a specific sequence of CreateLogFile and FlushBuffers calls. However, once stable, it granted SYSTEM-level access on fully patched Windows 11 23H2 and Server 2022.